13 Jan 2026

The Ministry of Justice’s interest seizure plan: A threat to law firm stability?

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has unveiled controversial plans to seize a significant portion of interest earned on lawyers’ client accounts – a move that could have far-reaching consequences for the legal sector.

Under the proposals, 50% of interest from individual client accounts and 75% from pooled accounts would be redirected to the MoJ’s central fund. The stated aim is to “strengthen the justice system,” but critics argue the scheme is both counterproductive and potentially catastrophic for many firms.

Why this matters

Interest income has become a vital revenue stream for law firms, particularly in recent years. According to the Law Society’s Financial Benchmarking Survey, average interest receipts soared to £500,000 per firm last year. For some practices, this income represents a substantial share of profitability.

Andrew Allen, Partner and Head of Legal Sector at PKF Francis Clark, and Chair of the survey working group, warns that the proposals amount to a “backdoor tax raid”. He explains:

“NatWest’s own benchmarking survey in 2025 told us that for 50% of law firms, interest profits represented at least 21% of their profits, and for 25% of firms it represented over 35%. For up to 10% of UK law firms, interest income represented over 50% of their profits.”

The risks

Andrew predicts that if implemented, the scheme could:

  • Force law firms into financial failure, causing hardship for consumers and employees
  • Increase legal fees, as firms attempt to offset lost income
  • Overburden the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which would need to intervene in failing firms to protect client interests

He also notes that firms may seek alternative arrangements with banks to avoid earning interest on client funds, such as negotiating lower banking charges or better borrowing rates. This would render the scheme ineffective in raising revenue, while still destabilizing the sector.

What’s next?

The consultation is ongoing, but the implications are clear: this proposal could reshape the economics of legal practice in the UK. Law firms, regulators, and clients alike should pay close attention to developments.

Featured in the Law Society Gazette

Andrew Allen’s insights on this issue were recently featured in the Law Society Gazette. You can read the full article here.

Want to discuss how these proposals could impact your firm?

Get in touch with our legal sector specialists today

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
GDPR permissions

Latest news

Number 10 Downing Street in London.

New government, same Budget deficit issue

24 July 2026

Read

Members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL): planning ahead in an uncertain political landscape 

24 July 2026

Read
Two women colleagues working together.

PKF Francis Clark celebrates second year in top 10 of UK’s Best Workplaces for Women

23 July 2026

Read

Zero-rated VAT on electricity: What does the announcement mean for charities?

23 July 2026

Read
A group of primary school children work on computer tablets in the classroom.

Academy trust handbook 2026: What finance leaders and trustees need to know

21 July 2026

Read

How to navigate private client tax planning in the age of AI and uncertainty 

16 July 2026

Read
Charles Bell at Bristol harbourside

Bristol-based Charles Bell becomes our newest licenced insolvency practitioner

15 July 2026

Read
New cars in a showroom

Employee Car Ownership Scheme changes delayed until 2030

15 July 2026

Read
Houses of Parliament in London

What businesses need to know about the Finance Bill 2026-27

14 July 2026

Read

Ecosystem services: some tax clarity

13 July 2026

Read

VAT Capital Goods Scheme (CGS) changes from 29 July 2026

10 July 2026

Read
Nick Farrant, of PKF Francis Clark

Poll: finance leaders resilient despite rising costs and economic uncertainty

9 July 2026

Read