13 Jan 2026

The Ministry of Justice’s interest seizure plan: A threat to law firm stability?

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has unveiled controversial plans to seize a significant portion of interest earned on lawyers’ client accounts – a move that could have far-reaching consequences for the legal sector.

Under the proposals, 50% of interest from individual client accounts and 75% from pooled accounts would be redirected to the MoJ’s central fund. The stated aim is to “strengthen the justice system,” but critics argue the scheme is both counterproductive and potentially catastrophic for many firms.

Why this matters

Interest income has become a vital revenue stream for law firms, particularly in recent years. According to the Law Society’s Financial Benchmarking Survey, average interest receipts soared to £500,000 per firm last year. For some practices, this income represents a substantial share of profitability.

Andrew Allen, Partner and Head of Legal Sector at PKF Francis Clark, and Chair of the survey working group, warns that the proposals amount to a “backdoor tax raid”. He explains:

“NatWest’s own benchmarking survey in 2025 told us that for 50% of law firms, interest profits represented at least 21% of their profits, and for 25% of firms it represented over 35%. For up to 10% of UK law firms, interest income represented over 50% of their profits.”

The risks

Andrew predicts that if implemented, the scheme could:

  • Force law firms into financial failure, causing hardship for consumers and employees
  • Increase legal fees, as firms attempt to offset lost income
  • Overburden the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which would need to intervene in failing firms to protect client interests

He also notes that firms may seek alternative arrangements with banks to avoid earning interest on client funds, such as negotiating lower banking charges or better borrowing rates. This would render the scheme ineffective in raising revenue, while still destabilizing the sector.

What’s next?

The consultation is ongoing, but the implications are clear: this proposal could reshape the economics of legal practice in the UK. Law firms, regulators, and clients alike should pay close attention to developments.

Featured in the Law Society Gazette

Andrew Allen’s insights on this issue were recently featured in the Law Society Gazette. You can read the full article here.

Want to discuss how these proposals could impact your firm?

Get in touch with our legal sector specialists today

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
GDPR permissions

Latest news

An ambulance outside a building

Administrators secure sale of Bristol ambulance company BAEMS Ltd, safeguarding services and jobs

22 May 2026

Read
A group of volunteers sorting donated clothes and items in a well-lit room.

What the Colchester VAT ruling means for charities

22 May 2026

Read
A large group of students sit on low leather seating while they study in a library.

What the Colchester VAT ruling means for further education institutions

22 May 2026

Read

Retirement planning as a law firm member

19 May 2026

Read

What leading our B Corp™ certification taught me

19 May 2026

Read
Two workmen in hardhats work together to feed copper wire through a hole at a construction site.

CIS fraud & HMRC’s supply‑chain clampdown

18 May 2026

Read
Business team discussing plan in the office

Could your business be owed money? Recovering unclaimed employment allowance

15 May 2026

Read

Dealmaking today: Uncertainty has a cost – don’t pay it twice

15 May 2026

Read
Female small business owner, working in her shop

Changes to small company accounts filing delayed

14 May 2026

Read
Two colleagues chatting whilst walking from a meeting room.

Changes to HMRC's approach to tax compliance for large businesses and beyond

14 May 2026

Read

Pillar 2 in the UK – FAQs on filing obligations

13 May 2026

Read
Two colleagues chatting and laughing while working.

People, culture and our journey to B Corp™

12 May 2026

Read