17 Dec 2022

How can personal pension contributions be used in relation to farm partnerships?

Pensions were first introduced in 1909 and since then have undergone a lot of changes and developments. Currently, they firmly remain as one of the greatest retirement and estate
planning tools available.

In this article, I would like to demonstrate how personal pension contributions can be used in relation to farm partnerships. The simplest way to see how pensions can help you pay less tax now and save for your future is to run through an example.

Meet Bob, 68, and Mary, 67. They are tenant farmers and operate in partnership. They have been working all their lives and they would now like to retire. So, in this tax year they have sold all their farming machinery, cattle and crops – amounting to a total of £250,400. Since their partnership is ceasing, the averaging of profits in the final year of the business is not available and so the full £250,400 is subject to income tax.

Bob and Mary got in touch with Francis Clark Financial Planning to find out if there is a way of minimising their income tax liability but saving for retirement. After the initial meeting, we identified that neither currently make pension contributions. Bob explained that he doesn’t think that pensions are any good, but Mary was open to the idea and remembered she had one from her first job. Let’s see what difference a personal pension contribution can make to their income tax positions.

Due to Mary’s £40,000 pension contribution, she can save £15,028 in tax and have £50,000 towards her retirement. Due to the availability of carry forward annual allowance
rules, she could, in theory, contribute as much as £125,200 gross to her pension in this tax year.

As well as provision of income in retirement and tax efficient extraction of profits from the business, pensions are also great for estate planning. This is because pensions do not form part of your taxable estate for Inheritance Tax (IHT) purposes. This is especially useful to farmers with children who don’t wish to be involved with their farming business, as they can be left with a pension pot instead. In Mary’s example, she has removed £40,000 from her eventual estate and a potential IHT charge – saving the beneficiaries of her will £16,000.

If you would like to discuss this in more detail or have any questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch with a member of our Financial Planning team.

Get in touch

Related insights

Colleagues in their office discussing an important matter.

What is an independent business review (IBR)?

30 January 2025

Read
Headshot Robert Gear.

PKF Francis Clark supports Quinbrook on £100m green transport investment

29 January 2025

Read
A blue tractor in a field on the right, next a river on the left. It is a bright, cloudy day.

My first time at the Oxford Farming Conference

28 January 2025

Read

Understanding HMRC's new guidelines on employment expense claims and risks

28 January 2025

Read
John Endacott

Succession planning: the longer-term impact of the Budget on businesses

23 January 2025

Read

Big win for HMRC in the Upper Tribunal of Sonder Europe Ltd TOMs VAT case

22 January 2025

Read
Man looking at a computer screen, analysing the data

Government's Cyber Essentials survey – key findings for SMEs

13 January 2025

Read

Will upcoming tax changes mean the end of the road for the double cab pick-up?

13 January 2025

Read
Nick Harris

Jobs saved as Remedi Solutions sold to Remedi Healthcare Ltd

20 December 2024

Read

Further HMRC guidance on the abolition of furnished holiday lets

20 December 2024

Read
A map of Cornwall and part of Devon including Penzance to Bideford.

Applications open for Good Growth funding

19 December 2024

Read

Farming through 2024: challenges, triumphs and evolving landscapes

18 December 2024

Read